2025 Mid-Session Update
Majority Whip Hardy Billington’s
2025 Mid-Session Legislative Update
Majority Chief Whip Hardy Billington
201 West Capitol Avenue Room 303-B
Jefferson City MO 65101
(573)751-4039
(573)300-9651- cell
https://www.facebook.com/FriendsforHardyBillington
Chief Whip Hardy Billington
We are almost at the halfway point of the 2025 legislative session, and I wanted to share my Chief Whip Legislative Update with you. I’m pleased to report the crime bill—the governors top priority—was passed by the Senate and only needs a quick vote by the House to go to the Governor for signing!
This year, 1,736 bills were introduced in the House, and so far, we have passed and sent 16 to the Senate. In recent years, a dysfunctional Senate stalled many bills, but this year is different. The Senate had 913 bills introduced and has already passed 28—a promising shift for House members.
Here is just a sampling of what I believe are some of the best bills moving forward this session.
In past years, critical legislation to cut taxes, stop abortion, halt illegal immigration, and support seniors, farmers, and small businesses often died once it reached the Senate. However, this year, we are making real progress on meaningful legislation that will improve Missouri.
Eliminating Programs, Shrinking Government & Saving Taxpayer Dollars
Here in Missouri, we are following President Trump’s lead in finding ways to save taxpayers’ money by cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from Missouri’s government. Our Speaker made Rep. Ben Baker the chair of the Government Efficiency Committee and charged him with providing Missourians with a more limited government. Speaker Patterson (R-Lee’s Summit) added.
“If President-Elect Trump, Elon Musk, and Vivek Ramaswamy can disrupt the bloated federal government’s feeding frenzy on taxpayer dollars, we should seize the moment and build upon the work we’ve been doing under Republican leadership for years. Last year, we unanimously passed HB 2111 to give Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick more authority to fight waste, fraud, and abuse at the state and local levels. I’m excited to work alongside Auditor Fitzpatrick and my colleagues in the House to protect taxpayer dollars and promote government efficiency.”
Over in the Senate, Senator Mary Elizabeth Coleman is leading the Committee on Government Efficiency (COGE). COGE will evaluate state agencies and departments to address inefficiencies, improve regulatory practices, and promote responsive governance. By conducting a thorough review of operations and policies, the committee aims to modernize procedures and enhance trust between the government and the people it serves. Chairman Baker’s first step involved passing HB 742. This bill prohibits state departments from allocating funds to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. It also bars these departments from mandating or incentivizing private-sector employers to adopt DEI programs as a condition for state contracts.
Of course, the big-spending liberals who are upset at Trump are just as angry about our efforts here in Missouri to shrink the size of government. Two weeks ago, dozens of protesters gathered at the Missouri Capitol to protest against Elon Musk, the Department of Government Efficiency, and our committees here in Missouri. Democratic Rep. Kathy Steinhoff (D-Columbia) stated in early February that while government can be more efficient, she is concerned that potential cuts could have unintended consequences in the future.
Rest assured, your Republican legislators will not be intimidated. We are committed to shrinking government and saving your tax dollars. Don’t forget—last year, House Republicans stood firm and passed a budget that cut spending for the first time in 12 years. Budget Chair Cody Smith and Vice Chair Dirk Denton helped Missouri cut $1.2 billion in spending and saved $1.6 billion of our surplus for a future rainy day.
Stopping Crime and Improving Public Safety in Missouri
Missouri House Bill 495 (HB 495) was introduced by Representative Brad Christ and was just passed by the Senate. The House will need to cast one more vote and then it will be the first bill signed by the governor this session and aims to enhance public safety through several key measures:
Establishment of a New Board of Police Commissioners: Effective August 28, 2025, this board will oversee the St. Louis Police Department, comprising four local citizen commissioners and the Mayor of St. Louis.
Enhanced Penalties for Stunt Driving and Street Takeovers: Repeat offenders will now face felony charges to deter dangerous driving behaviors.
Strengthened Child Welfare Protections: First-degree child endangerment, especially involving fentanyl or other drugs, will be classified as a "dangerous felony."
Expanded Definition of Rioting: The bill broadens the scope of rioting, increases penalties, and removes the need to prove conspiracy in related offenses.
Creation of a School Safety Committee: This committee will develop guidelines to prevent firearm violence in schools.
Mandatory Immigration Status Reporting: Law enforcement agencies will be required to report the immigration status of criminal offenders to the state.
Increased Penalties for Specific Crimes: The bill introduces tougher penalties for offenses such as burglary, organized retail theft, tampering with water supplies, and sex trafficking of minors.
About 12 years ago, the state gave St. Louis City control over its police department. Shortly after that, Kim Gardner became the city prosecutor and refused to prosecute criminals. Then, Tishaura Jones became Mayor and defunded the police department. This has led to rampant crime and an exodus of businesses and individuals leaving St. Louis.
Representative Brad Christ emphasized the urgency of addressing these issues, stating:
"For over a century, things remained unchanged, but after the shift, we’ve seen the police force stretched thin and crime rise. Some argue crime is down—I disagree. When you factor in population decline due to crime, the per capita numbers tell a different story. Crimes are underreported, multiple incidents are counted as one, and justifiable homicides skew the data." — Missouri House Floor Speech
HB 495 seeks to address these challenges by implementing comprehensive reforms aimed at bolstering public safety and restoring community trust in law enforcement. St. Louis used to be a thriving economic engine for our state, but because of safety issues, it is quickly becoming an economic drain. Stopping crime and protecting citizens in St. Louis will not only save lives in the city—it will benefit the surrounding region and the entire state. This bill has been passed by the House and Senate. As the Governors top priority, it will need one more quick vote in the House and then it will be signed into law quickly!
Repealing the Sunset on Gender Mutilation
I was happy to see my HB 35, pass the House last week. It removes the sunset clause from the gender mutilation bill and restricts gender transition procedures for minors. This permanent measure aims to protect vulnerable youth from irreversible medical interventions with potential long-term consequences.
When the original bill passed in 2023, Democrats insisted on adding a sunset provision as a compromise, allowing the restrictions to expire in 2027. This political maneuver undermined the bill’s long-term effectiveness, leaving Missouri children vulnerable to future policy shifts. HB 35 corrects this by ensuring the protections remain in place permanently.
By eliminating the expiration date, HB 35 ensures our commitment to responsible healthcare, preventing decisions made during adolescence from leading to future regret.
When I was speaking on the floor about this bill I stated:
"It is imperative that we provide consistent and lasting protections for our children, ensuring their health and safety are not subject to changing political climates."
In summary, HB 35 removes an unnecessary political sunset and solidifies permanent safeguards for Missouri’s youth, stopping the mutilation of their bodies and ensuring their well-being remains a legislative priority.
Prohibiting Boys from Competing in Girls Sports
Representative Brian Seitz and I both introduced a bill seeking to modify guidelines for student participation in athletic contests organized by sex. I’m backing his HB113 that aims to ensure fair competition in women's sports by restricting participation to individuals who are biologically female. This legislative effort continues the "Protect Women in Sports Act" passed in 2023, which included a sunset clause set to expire on August 28, 2027—a stalling tactic introduced by Democratic legislators during the 2023 session. HB 113 proposes to remove this expiration date, thereby making the protections permanent.
Representative Seitz emphasized the importance of this action, stating, "Ensuring a level playing field for female athletes is paramount; removing the sunset clause affirms our commitment to fairness in women's sports."
However, the bill has faced opposition from liberal Democratic lawmakers. During committee discussions, Representative LaDonna Appelbaum expressed concerns, stating, "This legislation marginalizes transgender youth who are already vulnerable. It sends a message of exclusion rather than inclusion."
By eliminating the sunset provision, HB 113 aims to provide lasting assurance that female athletes in Missouri can safely compete on an equitable basis, free from concerns about future policy reversals.
No Baby Left to Die: HB 195 Demands Medical Care for Infants Who Survive Abortion
While the left argues that live births rarely occur during abortions, a study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Volume 230, Issue 6, June 2024) indicates otherwise. The study found the following:
11.2% of abortions performed between 15 and 29 weeks of gestation resulted in a live birth.
50.6% of abortions performed between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation resulted in a live birth.
The risk of a live birth is 4.8 times higher for abortions performed between 20 and 24 weeks compared to those performed between 15 and 19 weeks.
Missouri House Bill 195 (HB 195), introduced by Representative Brian Seitz, seeks to establish the "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act." This legislation mandates that any infant born alive during or after an attempted abortion receives the same standard of medical care as any other newborn. Proponents argue that this act is essential to safeguard the rights and
lives of infants who survive abortion procedures, ensuring they are afforded appropriate medical attention and legal protections.
However, the bill has faced opposition from Democratic lawmakers. Representative LaDonna Appelbaum expressed concerns, stating, "This legislation could interfere with the doctor-patient relationship and imposes unnecessary regulations that may not reflect the complexities of medical situations." Additionally, Representative Sarah Unsicker argued, "This bill addresses a situation that is exceedingly rare and could lead to unintended consequences for medical professionals and patients facing difficult decisions."
I was shocked to hear Kay Park’s opposition testimony to this bill. She said, “Representative Stinnett and Health and Mental Health Committee, I am voicing my opposition to HB195 which requires a health care provider to exercise the same degree of care to preserve life for an infant born alive after an abortion. This bill is cruel and inhumane to the mother and the infant who is aborted due to a condition incompatible to life. Often these conditions are not discovered until late in the pregnancy. Compassionate medical care allows the mother to hold and comfort her infant after birth until it dies. This bill denies that comfort to the mother and baby by demanding immediate NICU care. It denies health care providers from making a compassionate choice, requiring them to transport the infant to a hospital for expensive care that will not preserve the life of the infant, rather than allowing the baby to die in comfort.” Can you believe there are people in this state who this it is compassionate to let “the baby dies in comfort” after the baby has fought so hard to survive and abortion? That mindset almost brings me to tears!!!
Supporters from Missouri Right to Life emphasize the moral imperative of the bill. A spokesperson commented, "Ensuring that infants born alive receive immediate medical care is a fundamental human rights issue. HB 195 reinforces our commitment to protecting the most vulnerable among us."
The bill was reviewed by the House Health and Mental Health Committee, which voted 12-5 in favor of advancing it. The majority of Republican members supported the bill, and while it is hard to believe the Democratic members predominantly opposed it. Following this vote, HB 195 was referred to the House Rules - Legislative Committee on February 27, 2025, and awaits further deliberation.
HB 247: Cutting DMV Hassle – A Five-Year Registration to Save You Time
I really like this idea and sure hope we get it done this year! Representative Bromley’s HB 247 proposes a five-year motor vehicle registration option for vehicles less than six years old, aiming to enhance convenience for Missouri residents by reducing the frequency of renewals. This change would decrease trips to their local license office, allowing citizens to save time. Supporters highlight that, with fewer renewals, the DMV could operate more efficiently, potentially reducing wait times and improving service quality for all patrons. The bill was reviewed
by the House Transportation Committee, which voted 12-1 in favor of advancing it, with one Democrat opposing the measure. While the current proposal applies to newer vehicles, I would love to amend it on the floor and extend this option to all vehicles, regardless of age, to further streamline the registration process and save everyone more time!
Ensuring Churches Can Never Be Shut Down Again
I was so frustrated during COVID, when so many places shut down the churches while mass protests were allowed to continue. That double standard was unacceptable, and HB 75 ensures it never happens again in Missouri. The "Missouri Religious Freedom Protection Act," aims to ensure that religious organizations can continue their practices without interference from public officials, even during emergencies. This legislation seeks to prevent any orders that could limit or prohibit religious gatherings, thereby safeguarding the free exercise of religion.
Representative Cathy Jo Loy, the bill's sponsor, emphasized its significance, stating, "House Bill 75 makes it clear to local governments that they can never shut down our churches again. I was proud to join my Republican colleagues in making very clear that in Missouri, our God-given rights are non-negotiable."
The American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri showed up to testify against the bill and stated to the committee. “While HB 75 includes carve outs for imminent danger due to weather emergencies, the language prohibiting orders that have “that effect of limiting or prohibiting” places of worship or religious groups from holding services and meetings is too broad. This proposed bill could impede the government’s ability to respond effectively to future pandemics or other public-health threats that endanger the lives of Missourians. As such, the ACLU of Missouri opposes HB 75 and urges you to vote no on the bill.”
The bill passed the House with a vote of 106-38 on February 13, 2025, and has been reported to the Senate for further consideration.
Ending Abortion Up to Birth: HJR 54 Brings Common-Sense Protections for the Unborn
One of the top priorities for House Republicans has been clarifying the confusing language narrowly passed in Amendment 3 last November. Out of state pro-choice groups spent over $30 million on ads persuading Missourians it was a reasonable change to our constitution. Unfortunately, the pro-life groups only had about $3 million, and most voters didn’t realize it allows even late term abortions right up to before birth.
I’m proud to have co-sponsored Missouri House Joint Resolution 54 (HJR 54), introduced by Representative Melanie Stinnett, that proposes a constitutional amendment to restrict abortions, and allow them only in cases of medical emergencies, fetal anomalies, rape, or incest. For abortions due to rape or incest, the procedure must occur within 12 weeks of gestation, accompanied by documentation of a report filed with law enforcement at least 48 hours prior.
Representative Stinnett emphasized the resolution's intent, stating, "Ultimately the goal, and the language, is to protect those that are most vulnerable."
Opponents argue that the measure undermines voter decisions. Mallory Schwarz, executive director of Abortion Action Missouri, stated, "It's not surprising to see in HJR 54 the same fear-mongering attacks that we've always fought, but we are clear, Missourians want and deserve access to abortion care."
I am a strong pro-life advocate and would prefer no exceptions, but right now this is probably the best language we can pass that would bring some sanity back to Missouri’s abortion laws and stop at least stop 99% of abortions. This was probably the saddest committee hearing of the session. I feel for the woman who came to oppose this legislation and I wonder how our country ever got to the place where loving mothers would consider it virtuous and good to kill their own child. My mother had an abortion before I was born and I’m so thankful she decided not to when she was pregnant with me—I guess that is why I get so emotional about this issue. Here are three testimonies that almost brought me to tears.
“When I faced the choice of what to do when I became unexpectedly pregnant, I chose to have my daughter. Every woman and family should have the right to choose. Women's rights and the right to control my body should outweigh a possible person. In addition, the will of the Missouri people is to respect women to make the right choice for them and their families. I am thankful I was able to choose to have my daughter out of love and not be forced into a pregnancy or raising her. Forcing women to raise children is detrimental to not only women and families, but the soon to be child. Please value my rights and the rights of women across Missouri.” —Alician Lee Clary.
“In the Fall of 1978, I discovered I was pregnant, despite my use of birth control. My husband and I already had two wonderful children aged 8 and 2 years old. We were very surprised and genuinely concerned about raising another child. Our financial resources were already strained and unpredictable. After much soul searching and discussion, we determined that the best thing for our family was to terminate the pregnancy. While it was very difficult, we were certain of our decision and have never regretted it. The abortion was performed by my gynecologist at Barnes Hospital and, importantly, I had a tubal ligation at the same time the pregnancy was terminated so that such a situation would not reoccur. I believe our decision to terminate the pregnancy was the responsible thing to do given all the reasons set out above. In retrospect, we believe we were able to do a better job raising the two children we already had who subsequently became responsible, educated and successful adults. All families should be able to make such a decision without Government interference.” — Nancy Collins.
In 2024, Missouri voters approved Amendment 3, which enshrined abortion access into the state constitution. Critics argue that this amendment went too far, allowing abortion up until birth, and that HJR 54 is necessary to restore reasonable protections for the unborn and ensure Missouri’s laws reflect the values of its citizens. SJR33 has also been filed by Sen. Schnelting and it is similar to the House version.
“As a mother of 5 but also one who has been on the other side of this issue. By feeling pressured as a young woman to seek and obtain 2 abortions. I personally know and understand the lasting effects on the mental health of the women who make the same decision. I implore you to consider the lives of not only the unborn child, but also both the physical and mental health of the women in the aftermath of an abortion. Ending a life should never have become so common that it's the norm rather than the exception for extreme cases.” —Jan Lowery.
Protecting College Student Organizations: HB 875 Defends Belief-Based Groups on Campus
Over the last few years, I’ve been frustrated by reports we have received about how some of our liberal Missouri colleges are discriminating against Christin and conservative kids in their schools. Liberal professors have been brainwashing our kids for years but now colleges are denying these conservative groups recognition as campus groups and sometimes even deeming them as hate groups. Thankfully my good friend Representative Darin Chappell passed HB 875, that will protect the rights of belief-based student associations at public institutions of higher learning. The bill prohibits these institutions from denying recognition or benefits to student groups that require their leaders to adhere to the organization's sincerely held beliefs, practices, or standards of conduct.
Byron Keelen told the committee about some of the discrimination conservative and religious students have faced at Missouri college campuses. He stated, “Over the past year, we have seen the intolerance of college campuses towards students of the Jewish, and Catholic religions and students with conservative values. These students of faith, particularly the Jewish students, were harassed by pro-Hamas sympathizers. They were threatened, even physically attacked and the administrations condoned this violence, and in some universities lent safe harbor to these protestors. Catholic students were denied the ability to set informational tables promoting their pro-life
message—conservatives at the St. Louis University Campus were denied the ability to form a Young America Foundation (YAF) Chapter because the radical student president at SLU deemed the YAF a hate group.” Representative Chappell emphasized the bill's intent, stating, "This legislation ensures that religious and ideological student organizations can maintain their integrity without facing discrimination from educational institutions."
However, some liberal groups oppose the bill. Mickey Dollens, with the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) Action Fund testified against House Bill 875 and said, “FFRF AF is an affiliate of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, a national nonprofit organization with over 40,000 members, including nearly 500 in Missouri. Our mission is to ensure that laws remain secular and protect the constitutional principle of separation between state and church. HB 875 allows “belief-based student associations” to exclude individuals based on their adherence to the group’s self-defined mission, beliefs, or standards of conduct. This could lead to: Exclusion Based on Identity: LGBTQ+ students, racial minorities, or students with differing religious beliefs could be barred from participation in
leadership roles, or even membership, simply because they do not conform to an organization’s arbitrary requirements.”
HB 872 could lead to: Exclusion Based on Identity: LGBTQ+ students, racial minorities, or students with differing religious beliefs could be barred from participation in leadership roles, or even membership, simply because they do not conform to an organization’s arbitrary requirements.” — Mickey Dollens, with the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) Action Fund
I was happy this bill passed the House with a party-line vote of 108-47 on February 27, 2025, and now the Senate can take it up and get it passed.
Defending the Second Amendment & Shielding Missouri from Federal Anti-Gun Laws
We have all seen how liberals in Washington are trying to tax ammo and harass firearm manufactures. We may have a way to protect gunowners in Missouri. My buddy and Army Lt Colone Representative Bill Hardwick introduced HB 1175, also called the "Second Amendment Preservation Act." This legislation seeks to invalidate federal infringements on Second Amendment rights within Missouri, including certain taxes, registrations, or confiscations related to firearms and ammunition. It proposes civil penalties for political subdivisions or law enforcement agencies that enforce such federal regulations, reinforcing Missouri's commitment to safeguarding constitutional rights.
Representative Hardwick emphasized, "There's a lot of people in our state who feel like the federal government has gotten too powerful, that it's gone too far," he said. "And they would like a law that both protects their rights under the Constitution, the Second Amendment, but also pushes back against federal overreach."
Nicole Tackett shared her opposing view with the committee. “Gun regulations should be more stringent than they are on the state level in MO. Passing a bill that prevents state law enforcement from assisting federal law
enforcement is counterintuitive and puts more at risk than helps. The constituents that you represent are needing your protection, not your enabling of violence and more division.”
I believe HB 1175 is crucial for defending individual liberties and look forward to voting for this bill on the House floor. HB 1175 was reported "Do Pass" in the House, with a strict party line vote of 9 AYES and 4 NOES.
Tax Cuts and Fairer Vehicle Valuations for Missouri Residents
This year, numerous tax cut proposals have been introduced. Two that have gained significant attention are:
Representative Rodger Reedy, is driven to save Missourians from burdensome vehicle property taxes with HB 816. The bill aims to adjust the methods used to assess vehicle values for taxation, ensuring more accurate and fair valuations for vehicle owners. One key provision prevents assessors from valuing a vehicle at more than the amount listed by the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA). HB 816 passed unanimously in the House Ways and Means Committee.
HB 100, sponsored by Representative Bishop Davidson, seeks to cut the income tax rate to 4%. The bill also includes provisions for rates to continue decreasing if Missouri meets certain revenue thresholds. Additionally, it establishes a Tax Reform Fund, which would grow as state revenues increase. The bill had a public hearing on February 4, 2025, and a vote is expected soon.
House Republicans Crack Down on Illegal Immigration with New Enforcement Bills
Several immigration-related bills have been introduced and are expected to have a committee hearing soon:
HB 540, sponsored by Representative West, mandates that all employers in Missouri utilize the federal E-Verify system to confirm the employment eligibility of new hires, aiming to prevent the hiring of unauthorized workers.
HB 861, introduced by Representative Simmons, proposes the establishment of the Missouri Immigration Enforcement Act, granting state and local law enforcement agencies the authority to enforce federal immigration laws and detain individuals suspected of violating immigration regulations.
HB 1129 is a bill I introduced, requiring law enforcement officers to document an individual's immigration status during traffic stops, enhancing data collection on non-citizens within the state.
HB 1163, sponsored by Representative Bill Lucas, establishes the offense of hindering prosecution for municipal officials who vote to enact or adopt sanctuary policies and withholds state funding for municipalities that implement such policies in violation of state law.
These legislative efforts reflect House Republicans' commitment to enhancing immigration enforcement, promoting employer accountability, and ensuring cooperation between state and federal authorities.
Liberal Legislation That Is DEAD!
While the legislation we are working to pass is our top priority, it’s equally important to recognize the liberal Democrat bills that we have successfully stopped (notice how many deal with elections and voting). In Jefferson City, it’s not just about what we pass—it’s also about what we don’t pass!
There are numerous Democrat-sponsored bills that have stalled, and here are just a few I’m closely monitoring to ensure they stay blocked. Of course, we must always stay vigilant for amendments. Democrats frequently take the language from their failed bills and attempt to sneak it into other legislation being debated on the floor.
As the leader of our Whip Team, I ensure that our members are always ready to vote down any liberal amendments that threaten our conservative priorities. Rest assured, we will continue fighting to keep Missouri on the right path.
Overall Outlook
We are having one of the most productive sessions in recent memory, and many of our conservative priorities— previously stalled due to Senate infighting—are now up and moving! I’m thankful for our House leadership team and our caucus members who have been chomping at the bit to get to work and make Missouri a better place to live and raise a family.
I have been particularly impressed with the new freshman class. They have hit the ground running and are fully committed to advancing our conservative agenda. Of course, it helps to have Governor Kehoe leading our efforts—he is a bundle of energy and has pushed hard to get things done!
We are also fortunate to have the support of our other statewide elected officials: • Attorney General Bailey has been leading our crime fighting efforts.
Secretary of State Hoskins is focused on ensuring our election system makes it easy to vote but hard to cheat.
Treasurer Malik has led efforts to prevent our investments from going to China.
Auditor Fitzpatrick is using the new powers we gave him to uncover waste, fraud, and abuse.
Last but not least, I want to thank Lt. Governor Wasinger for bringing his conservative values to the Senate. It’s inspiring to see him and all our statewide officeholders leading from the front!
Majority Chief Whip Hardy Billington
[email protected] https://www.facebook.com/FriendsforHardyBillington/
201 West Capitol Avenue Room 303-B
Jefferson City MO 65101
(573)751-4039 | (573)300-9651- cell
Representative Hardy Billington, a Republican, is the Majority Chief Whip in the Missouri House and represents parts of Butler and
Dunklin Counties (District 152) in the Missouri House of Representatives. He was elected to his first two-year term in November
2018. In addition to his legislative duties, Billington is also a property owner and former small business owner. For 18 years, he
owned and operated a heating and cooling business in Poplar Bluff. He was honorably discharged at the rank of Staff Sergeant after
serving his country for 12 years in the Army National Guard.
Billington graduated from the Basic Institute of Technology. Billington received the Missouri School Boards’ Association “Master
Board Member Award” and the Butler County Republican Central Committee’s “Kenneth M. Link Service Award.” He served on the
Butler County Republican Central Committee, Missouri Republican State Committee, and Poplar Bluff HVAC and fair housing advisory
boards, and is a former president of the Poplar Bluff R-I School Board.
Born in Los Angeles, California, Billington currently resides in Poplar Bluff with his wife, Dianne. They have three children five
grandchildren. They attend Faith Baptist Church, where Billington is a deacon.
